Reading list.

Last modified on August 25, 2018 by Alex


What is this list?

Aug 25th, 2018

http://blog.higher-order.com/blog/2012/09/13/what-purity-is-and-isnt/

Aug 24th, 2018

https://pchiusano.github.io/2014-05-21/what-effects-are-worth-tracking.html

Aug 17th, 2018

Why Men Stay Single? Evidence from Reddit Original, web.archive.org.

Aug 14th, 2018

https://archive.fo/At5am#selection-801.1-804.0

Aug 8th, 2018

https://web.archive.org/web/19971012140435/http://www.lhup.edu/~DSIMANEK/cargocul.htm

If you’re doing an experiment, you should report everything that you think might make it invalid–not only what you think is right about it: other causes that could possibly explain your results; and things you thought of that you’ve eliminated by some other experiment, and how they worked–to make sure the other fellow can tell they have been eliminated.

Details that could throw doubt on your interpretation must be given, if you know them. You must do the best you can–if you know anything at all wrong, or possibly wrong–to explain it. If you make a theory, for example, and advertise it, or put it out, then you must also put down all the facts that disagree with it, as well as those that agree with it. There is also a more subtle problem. When you have put a lot of ideas together to make an elaborate theory, you want to make sure, when explaining what it fits, that those things it fits are not just the things that gave you the idea for the theory; but that the finished theory makes something else come out right, in addition.

In summary, the idea is to try to give all of the information to help others to judge the value of your contribution; not just the information that leads to judgment in one particular direction or another.


Why didn’t they discover that the new number was higher right away? It’s a thing that scientists are ashamed of–this history–because it’s apparent that people did things like this: When they got a number that was too high above Millikan’s, they thought something must be wrong–and they would look for and find a reason why something might be wrong. When they got a number closer to Millikan’s value they didn’t look so hard. And so they eliminated the numbers that were too far off, and did other things like that. We’ve learned those tricks nowadays, and now we don’t have that kind of a disease.

We absolutely do!

One example of the principle is this: If you’ve made up your mind to test a theory, or you want to explain some idea, you should always decide to publish it whichever way it comes out. If we only publish results of a certain kind, we can make the argument look good. We must publish both kinds of results.

Aug 5th, 2018

Aug 4th, 2018

Future-Proofing Your URIs

Links: Page 1, Page 2

The Dragon In My Garage

Link

Belief in Belief

Links: 1, 2

A Collection of Definitions of Intelligence

Link

This paper is a survey of a large number of informal definitions of “intelligence” that the authors have collected over the years. Naturally, compiling a complete list would be impossible as many definitions of intelligence are buried deep inside articles and books. Nevertheless, the 70-odd definitions presented here are, to the authors’ knowledge, the largest and most well referenced collection there is.

Taboo Your Words

Link

Note to myself

They have a great stylesheet, :wink: :wink:. Harry Potter and Methods of Rationality.

The Relativity of Wrong

Link

All in All, Another Brick in the Motte